They must be joking, but seriously driving home a point.
Them Georges St-Pierre bashers who’ll grab every opportunity to smite on GSP and what they think he stands for now in MMA: decision wins, lay and pray, fighting safely and just plain boredom.
But they shouldn’t exploit Chris Lytle’s guillotine choke win over Dan Hardy to advance their cause; that’s getting way too far ahead of themselves.
There’s such a concept called “case-to-case basis.”
Did Hardy have the temerity to attempt a double-leg takedown against GSP and consequently expose his neck for a “guillo?” No.
It is regrettable that GSP played with Hardy like a cat to a mouse, letting his prey last the whole five rounds as his idea of fun.
Or just another daily workout routine.
So what does Tito Ortiz submitting Ryan Bader in the first round—while Jon Jones did it to the latter only in the second round—really mean?
Or that of Nate Marquardt’s KO of Demian Maia whereas Anderson Silva danced away from the submission specialist into a decision win?
I’m not sure exactly, but I believe their meaning lies somewhere between “not much” and “nothing at all.”
Read more MMA news on BleacherReport.com