Georges St-Pierre replies to Johny Hendricks’ calls for a rematch: ‘Stick around for a bit’

Last Saturday, for the first time since 2007, Georges St-Pierre watched a non-interim UFC welterweight title fight from the comfort of a living room couch.
Not only that, but St-Pierre did so in the company of popular actor and former Cali…

Last Saturday, for the first time since 2007, Georges St-Pierre watched a non-interim UFC welterweight title fight from the comfort of a living room couch.

Not only that, but St-Pierre did so in the company of popular actor and former California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. So suffice to say, the now former champ enjoyed his UFC 171 experience.

“I was just watching it as a fan and it was a lot of fun,” St-Pierre said on Monday’s edition of The MMA Hour.

“Personally I scored the fight to Johny Hendricks. I believe he had rounds one, two and five. Most people I know, they think it was (Robbie) Lawler that won the fight. It was a very tight fight though, it could’ve gone either way.”

As a result of St-Pierre’s decision to vacant his welterweight title and take an indefinite leave of absence from MMA, the belt was once again up for grabs, and Hendricks and Lawler engaged in a remarkable war of attrition for the right to succeed St-Pierre as UFC champion.

Much of the fight was spent inside the pocket, as both men traded heavy blows for 25 minutes. Hendricks ultimately took the judges’ decision by a unanimous verdict, with two out of the three judges agreeing with St-Pierre’s assessment and awarding Hendricks rounds one, two and five.

“I think it came down to the first round,” St-Pierre said of the fight. “I believe Lawler, the rounds that he won, it was more decisively, and he did more damage on the face, but sometimes that doesn’t mean anything.



“Lawler had a lot of damage too, but you couldn’t see the damage on the legs. Damage on the face sometimes is superficial, so that’s one of the reasons I think Hendricks won the fight.”

While the fireworks provided by Hendricks and Lawler made for an entertaining Saturday night, they did little to spark St-Pierre’s interest in returning to the sport he dominated for close to a decade.

St-Pierre has made it no secret that he walked away from MMA due to what he perceives to be a rampant PED problem across the sport’s landscape, as well as unspecified personal issues. And until those two matters can be addressed, St-Pierre expects to remain on the sidelines.

“When I fought Carlos Condit, I was really hungry,” he said. “When I fought (Nick) Diaz, I was not as much hungry. When I fought Hendricks, my training camp, I was even less hungry, and I felt like I needed to step out to get some time to see if I want to do this or not again.

“For now, I don’t want to do it. I needed to step out and stay out of the radar. That’s one of the things I said. I didn’t know if it was going to be six months, a year, a year and a half, I don’t know. But right now, I don’t feel like coming back right now. It’s not right for me.”

If anything, because of St-Pierre’s exit, opportunity is now the name of the game for the UFC’s welterweight division, as there are no shortage of contenders already staking their claim to Hendricks’ belt.

And of course, St-Pierre’s choice for No. 1 contender should come as no surprise.

Rory MacDonald,” St-Pierre said, referencing his longtime friend and Tristar training partner who recently rebounded with a convincing win at UFC 170.

“If very happy for Rory. He did an amazing fight against Demian Maia and he proved he’s the No. 1 contender.”

MacDonald, along with UFC 171 victors Hector Lombard and Tyron Woodley, wasted little time stating their cases for a title shot in the wake of Hendricks’ win. Even Nick Diaz, the ubiquitous fan favorite who may be the division’s biggest pay-per-view draw, announced his intention to end his self-imposed retirement and chase the belt.

Though if Hendricks has his wish, above all else, he’d prefer a rematch against St-Pierre. And because of the magic of The MMA Hour, he even got his chance to personally request one at the end of St-Pierre’s interview.

“Listen, stick around for a bit and keep the title,” St-Pierre replied. “We’ll see what’s going to happen in the sport. If some things change, maybe we’ll get together again.”

Poll
Who would win a rematch between Hendricks and GSP?



  7428 votes | Results

The MMA Hour – 222 – Georges St-Pierre

Former UFC welterweight champion Georges St-Pierre gives his thoughts on UFC 171 and updates us on his future.

<iframe src=’http://www.sbnation.com/videos/iframe?id=42337′ frameborder=’0′ seamless=’true’ marginwidth=’0′ mozallowfullscreen=’true’ webkitallowfullscreen=’true’ name=’42337-chorus-video-iframe’></iframe>

Former UFC welterweight champion Georges St-Pierre gives his thoughts on UFC 171 and updates us on his future.

<iframe src='http://www.sbnation.com/videos/iframe?id=42337' frameborder='0' seamless='true' marginwidth='0' mozallowfullscreen='true' webkitallowfullscreen='true' name='42337-chorus-video-iframe'></iframe>

The MMA Hour – 222 – Johny Hendricks

New UFC welterweight champion Johny Hendricks looks back at his thrilling win over Robbie Lawler at UFC 171.

<iframe src=’http://www.sbnation.com/videos/iframe?id=42329′ frameborder=’0′ seamless=’true’ marginwidth=’0′ mozallowfullscreen=’true’ webkitallowfullscreen=’true’ name=’42329-chorus-video-iframe’></iframe>

New UFC welterweight champion Johny Hendricks looks back at his thrilling win over Robbie Lawler at UFC 171.

<iframe src='http://www.sbnation.com/videos/iframe?id=42329' frameborder='0' seamless='true' marginwidth='0' mozallowfullscreen='true' webkitallowfullscreen='true' name='42329-chorus-video-iframe'></iframe>

No Cheering in the Press Room: Examining the MMA Media’s Culture of Disinterest

The decision to pursue a career as a member of the sports media requires certain sacrifices—your heart bleeds, I’m sure. Depending on the role one occupies within the space, there are a number of rules, both written and unwritten, that one is expected to follow in order to be taken seriously. For example, taking selfies […]

The decision to pursue a career as a member of the sports media requires certain sacrifices—your heart bleeds, I’m sure. Depending on the role one occupies within the space, there are a number of rules, both written and unwritten, that one is expected to follow in order to be taken seriously. For example, taking selfies […]

The MMA Hour – 222 – Herb Dean

Referee Herb Dean discusses some of his recent controversial calls inside the Octagon.

<iframe src=’http://www.sbnation.com/videos/iframe?id=42343′ frameborder=’0′ seamless=’true’ marginwidth=’0′ mozallowfullscreen=’true’ webkitallowfullscreen=’true’ name=’42343-chorus-video-iframe’></iframe>

Referee Herb Dean discusses some of his recent controversial calls inside the Octagon.

<iframe src='http://www.sbnation.com/videos/iframe?id=42343' frameborder='0' seamless='true' marginwidth='0' mozallowfullscreen='true' webkitallowfullscreen='true' name='42343-chorus-video-iframe'></iframe>

So You Think You Can Spot Sloppy Footwork?

I’m going to talk briefly today about something which you will see over and over again. A fighter wins or loses and the forums are flooded with posts about how he has bad footwork. Simultaneously, I see fighters praised for having good footwork who dis…

I’m going to talk briefly today about something which you will see over and over again. A fighter wins or loses and the forums are flooded with posts about how he has bad footwork. Simultaneously, I see fighters praised for having good footwork who display obvious flaws.

Here’s the problem: There isn’t just one method of footwork for everyone.

There are certain things which everyone should be doing. For instance, crossing the feet should be avoided at all costs. But to say that a fighter has horrible footwork just because his doesn’t look like another fighter’s—whom you decree to have good footwork—is just not a great way to go about things.

Where does this come from? Well, when Muhammad Ali hit the boxing scene he was something to behold. He moved like no-one had ever moved at heavyweight and it attracted a great deal of attention. In talking himself up, Ali also talked down the likes of Joe Louis for what he perceived to be slow, shoddy footwork.

Check out this charming scene between Muhammad Ali and the late, great Cus D’amato (trainer of Mike Tyson, Floyd Patterson and Jose Torres).

Hold on a minute though. Freddie Roach and many others consider Joe Louis to be one of the finest technical boxers of all time. Yet he had terrible footwork? Well, no. He didn’t.

Louis’ footwork suited Louis’ needs and Louis’ style. He was a heavy hitter who liked to stay in range for counters. He stayed in his stance with his head off line, and shuffled towards his opponent. Sometimes he would take a slight step back to see if he could bait his opponent in, and eventually they would fall for it and he would hammer them with the big shots. I talk often about creating collisions and Louis is a beautiful case study.

Ali’s footwork, meanwhile, was a means to his end. He too wanted his opponents walking into his punches, but he accomplished this by being elusive and providing a great deal of hyper active movement, punctuated by flicking jabs. When he had his opponent annoyed enough to be reaching at him, he’d lower the boom with his favorite right hand counter, commonly called the Anchor Punch (something which I shall discuss more in my upcoming print book, which is a technical biography of Ali). 

Another fighter who was excellent at creating the chase was Willie Pep. It was the same move over and over and over again. He would step his foot back and begin circling with his feet level. As his opponent either turned to face him or moved to cut him off, Pep would step in with his right foot and nail them with a southpaw left straight. 

Count how many times Pep does it. It’s remarkable.

Sound familiar? Holly Holm does exactly the same thing. And there are plenty of fighters out there who have picked up on baiting the chase. Lyoto Machida is a master of a very karate-esque version of it.

So we have the shuffling footwork and the dancing footwork but there’s more.

A fighter whom Ali also mocked for his footwork was George Foreman. Here’s the thing, Foreman (at his best) was considered one of the best ring cutters in the sport. He had bad performances where he got wild, but against Ken Norton and Muhammad Ali, his feet were looking brilliant. To recall that massively overused phrase in any English football broadcast: Foreman had “neat feet for a big man”.

Here’s Ali’s usual eloquent salesmanship, spliced in with George Plimpton and Norman Mailer’s more sobering assessment of Foreman, from the film When We Were Kings. If you have an hour and a half, watch the whole movie because it’s easily the best fight film ever made.

Remember the Rumble in the Jungle? Why do you think Ali went to the ropes? He didn’t have a choice. Foreman could take a shot with the best of them, his hands were always all over his opponent’s hands and checking punches preemptively—something we saw a little of in Lawler versus Hendricks)—and when he got near enough the ropes he would often just push his opponent into them.

The aforementioned Willie Pep had the exact same trouble in his incredible quartet of bouts with Sandy Saddler. Saddler also adopted the hands out in front “mummy” style of fighting, and cut off the ring with the best of them. He also butted, elbowed and generally fought dirtier than Foreman. A couple of decades later, he taught a young George Foreman the same style.

Let’s not forget the greatest of ring cutters, Julio Cesar Chavez. He too squared up to his opponents, offering more of a target, but moved them to the ropes anyway.

Louis wanted to waltz his opponent into punches, Ali wanted to peck and bait the chase, and Foreman wanted to push his way to the ropes and then get to work. So which one had the bad footwork? 

None of them. Refusal to dance is not bad footwork. Shuffling is not bad footwork. Squaring up and plodding in is not bad footwork—If you use that footwork to achieve your ends.

A quick example would be how the Diaz brothers and Fabio Maldonado love to fight against the fence, and are brilliant once they get there, but cannot follow an opponent who uses lateral movement. Their long, side on stance does not fit well with cutting off the cage. Even in a ring, with lovely 90 degree corners, it is necessary to square up a little in order to trap someone there.

My purpose in this short piece is not to point to examples of bad footwork, however. I intended to highlight that a fighter’s footwork is not about looking like another fighter’s. There were plenty of people who—before Muhammad Ali won his first world title—said that Ali’s footwork was horrible because it didn’t look like Louis’. And there are plenty today who think that dancing is the pinnacle of footwork.

The truth is that different strokes work for different folks. If a fighter’s footwork is conducive to their best fighting method, it is good. If it is letting a fighter escape as they try to cut off the ring, or it is running them onto the fence too often, or it is leaving them off balance so that they fall each time they are clipped, then it is problematic. But whether it’s beautiful or ugly, it is results that matter, not looks. 

Pick up Jack’s eBooks Advanced Striking and Elementary Striking from his blog, Fights Gone ByJack can also be found on Facebook and Twitter.

Read more MMA news on BleacherReport.com