Unsealed lawsuit documents detail dana white’s reaction to CM Punk Salary Backlash from UFC Fighters

Dana White and CM PunkDana White and the UFC have always worked, both publicly and privately, to keep fighter salaries out of the…

Dana White and CM Punk

Dana White and the UFC have always worked, both publicly and privately, to keep fighter salaries out of the public eye.

While the UFC CEO’s policy was to not reveal a fighter’s pay unless they had misrepresented it to the public, White is well aware that athletes would regularly disclose their earnings to one another. That bit of information comes according to a 2017 deposition for the UFC antitrust lawsuit that was recently unsealed by federal judge Richard Boulware.

“All the fighters know what other fighters are making,” White said. “They all talk. They all know. Even guys who say they don’t want their number out there, they tell” (h/t MMA Fighting).

As expected, it occasionally led to flare-ups among fighters with one example coming to White’s mind regarding a professional wrestler who had signed with the promotion before having any professional fights under his belt.

“It just happened recently again, too,” White said in the deposition. “We had some guy that was — that was paid a certain amount of money and never — oh, the professional wrestler that we brought in. Not Brock [Lesnar], the other one.”

“CM Punk?” the attorney asked.

“Oh, yeah,” White replied. “People went crazy when they saw what he got paid. … Even the women.”

Punk’s disclosed payout for his promotional debut at UFC 203 against Mickey Gall was $500,000, however, he was actually paid more than double that figure. Per a report from Bloody Elbow and newly unsealed UFC lawsuit documents, Punk was paid a whopping $1,042,736. The information was made public as part of the class action lawsuit being brought against the promotion by more than 1,200 fighters who have in the past or currently work with the UFC.

The host of UFC veterans suing the promotion for antitrust violations has made fighter pay, and the UFC’s public and private communication about it, a key part of its case by arguing that the promotion conspired to lower fighter pay as part of a scheme to monopolize the market for top-tier MMA fighters. 

Was Dana White Justified in Giving CM Punk a Bigger Piece of the Pie?

According to a copy of CM Punk’s contract which was unsealed in the lawsuit, the former AEW star who recently returned to WWE after nearly a decade, jumped straight toward the top of the UFC’s disclosed pay scale with any additional money owed to him being paid through a separate letter of agreement.

Multiple fighters vented their frustration over the pro wrestler’s top-shelf payout.

“CM Punk made $500k on his entry fight while the rest of us pay to fight?” wrote then-UFC bantamweight Cat Zingano. “Y’all should be ashamed UFC.”

“Nothing against CM Punk make half million for his MMA debut,” wrote former lightweight champion Rafael dos Anjos. “But I think champs should be [making] that too, people who dedicated [an] entire life.”

One thing that cannot be disputed is the fact that CM Punk’s presence at UFC 203 bolstered the event, leading to a reported 450,000 buys and generating $26,995,500 in revenue for the promotion.

UFC Anti-Trust Lawsuit Could Pay Fighters Massive Windfall

The ongoing anti-trust lawsuit against the UFC appears to be gaining traction, and fighters could receive a massive windfall of money for damages if the lawsuit were to pass. MMA journalist John Nash tweeted about his discoveries regarding the anti-trust lawsuit, and any fighter who fought in the UFC since 2010 will be entitled to […]

The post UFC Anti-Trust Lawsuit Could Pay Fighters Massive Windfall appeared first on LowKickMMA.com.

The ongoing anti-trust lawsuit against the UFC appears to be gaining traction, and fighters could receive a massive windfall of money for damages if the lawsuit were to pass.

MMA journalist John Nash tweeted about his discoveries regarding the anti-trust lawsuit, and any fighter who fought in the UFC since 2010 will be entitled to a part of the proposed $1.6 billion settlement:

The UFC’s huge sale last year for over $4 billion will likely work against them here, as the massive settlement could be viewed as coverable by the deep pockets of new owners WME-IMG.

For comparison, Nash says former UFC competitor Strikeforce paid their fighters 63 percent of their overall revenue. Meanwhile, economist Andrew Zimbalist denies the authenticity of the UFC’s claim of fighter/revenue numbers:

A group of fighters led by former UFC title contender Jon Fitch banded together in 2010 in an effort to create a fighters’ union. Fitch says any fighter who competed for the UFC between December 2010 to December 2014 are entitled to payouts unless they choose to opt out.

Economists actually place the money owed to said fighters could be three times as much as the $1.6 billion figure.

How do you see this lawsuit playing out? Will the fighters ever receive money due them?

The post UFC Anti-Trust Lawsuit Could Pay Fighters Massive Windfall appeared first on LowKickMMA.com.