The UFC has produced few international stars like Georges St. Pierre and Anderson Silva in recent memory, fighters with worldwide appeal. There may finally have another, however, in Junior dos Santos. Fighters that gain international appeal usually do …
Fighters that gain international appeal usually do so both in and out of the octagon, though their championing the sport through title defenses doesn’t hurt. There’s also something else to these fighters, something in their back story or in their person, that appeals to a greater audience.
Regardless of how they’ve garnered that attention, they always have a spotlight upon them and are responsible for carrying the sport of MMA as it grows and expands.
JDS is slowly gaining similar status, and if he keeps fighting the way he has, his international fame will only grow. He’s the current heavyweight champion. His last two fights, the first against Cain Velasquez for the title, and the second against Frank Mir to defend the title, have ended by a decisive KO and TKO, respectively.
Before his titled status, JDS grew up as a professional, fighting in Brazil’s small MMA promotions before making his UFC debut in 2008 at UFC 90. His first UFC fight was against Fabricio Werdum; JDS won by KO in a fight that was called the upset of the year by Fight! Magazine and NBC Sports.
Ever since, he’s rocked his way to the top, where he stands as the undisputed champion.
What’s more, JDS has the kind of background that allows him to keep his status in perspective. Before all of this, he grew up in poverty, as he explains to Chuck Mindenhall in an interview.
My family was very, very poor. My dad worked in construction, and my mom cleaned houses. I began working when I was very young to help. I sold ice cream in the streets when I was 10 years old, and then I became a newspaper boy.
JDS obviously worked past this condition, but he never forgot about it. At his last fight, UFC 146, another young Brazilian, who now lives in the same conditions JDS once did, was brought along and made a celebrity alongside the heavyweight fighter. That young boy, Breno Luis Ferreira, explained dos Santos’ greatness more succinctly: “Cigano is the strongest man in the world. He can defeat anybody, even though he is nice.”
After dos Santos’ victory, UFC commentator Mike Goldberg explained what a victory for JDS meant that night for the greater community of his supporters.
What a dream come true not only for Junior dos Santos, but for all of those who he shares his stardom, his fame, and his heart with.
With the story of JDS as a once-impoverished youth conquering his environment to become a great champion, the world is now watching a man who is able to share his fame and glory, to cash in his benefits to pay for others’ opportunities.
More often than not, though, these stories slip through the cracks. I’m not one to try and tout the successes of fighters outside the ring at every opportunity, mainly because overcoming obstacles in life is relative for each fighter.
But in seeing how dos Santos’ story fits into the greater scheme of UFC stardom, the sport and the organization could use a champion like this.
Compared to GSP, the tactician who appears to the world as the artist of MMA, or Anderson Silva, the phenomenon who seems unbeatable through some agreement with unearthly powers, JDS is the striker who slung fists to work his way up.
Moreover, it appears that JDS will never quite be the playboy that GSP and Silva became, and we like it that way. He represents the struggle of finding your place within the world. JDS will never be defined as an individual, but it doesn’t appear that he wants to be.
In the end, JDS is telling a story that belongs to his people. But with each new victory, with each level of greatness he achieves, the numbers included as part of his people grow exponentially.
As the UFC’s presence expands across the world, dos Santos’ title-holding couldn’t have come at a better time. He offers a traditional story of a different kind of champion, and where he once needed the UFC to get to that point, it now seems that the UFC needs him more than ever.
It has been argued before: The UFC’s rule against kneeing the head of an opponent while the opponent is on the ground should be overturned. Lately, however, the sport could stand to revisit this rule given some of the latest fights, the evolution…
It has been argued before: The UFC’s rule against kneeing the head of an opponent while the opponent is on the ground should be overturned. Lately, however, the sport could stand to revisit this rule given some of the latest fights, the evolution of styles and the momentum of the sport.
First, I will confess—kneeing a grounded opponent can be extremely dangerous. In fact, it may potentially be the most vicious move in the sport, as most of us remember from the old days of PRIDE.
Despite this, it may be time to correct this with careful fighting, not legislation.
During a pre-fight press conference held before UFC 110, Dana White explained that he wouldn’t mind legalizing knees on the ground, so long as the people are ready to accept the new rule.
“Eventually, when the whole world isn’t afraid of this sport anymore, then we can add knees to the head,” White said.
Wanderlei Silva, who will fight Rich Franklin in a rematch at next week’s UFC 147, expressed his favor of knees on the ground nearly a year after White did the same in an interview with HDNet’s Michael Schiavello (via MMAFighting.com):
Kicks on the ground, maybe no, but I think guys need to use knees on the ground because sometimes guys will just put their four points on the ground so you can’t hit them. I think in the future if I could change some things, I would allow knees to the ground and maybe take out the elbows.
Silva’s words explain the timeliness of reintroducing this debate. The main event of last month’s UFC 146—Cain Velasquez vs. Antonio Silva—was one of the bloodiest fights we’ve seen recently. Velasquez threw his elbows in Silva’s face while Silva worked hard to defend from his back. Silva held out for a while, but eventually lost by TKO. More immediately in the fight, though, he lied covered in blood from the sharp strikes of Velasquez’s elbows.
I also think that elbows on the ground should not be allowed. For the most part, they cause cuts, which are different then KOs, TKOs or Subs. They also tend to make a bloody mess, sometimes from relatively minor damage, and this does not help MMA as it tends to alienate many people to the sport.
Here, we see the alternative that Wanderlei Silva was talking about. Elbows are sharp strikes that chip away at an opponent, often by cutting at the face. Knees on the ground, while much more dangerous, actually have a tactical use.
And so we’re two arguments to answer. The first, which is the effectiveness of knees on the ground as a tactical move, is fairly established. I admit, fighters have (like all intelligent people) found ways to win fights around the current rule. Silva’s addressing the “four points on the ground” speaks to that immediately. There’s also the “lay-and-pray” strategy that secures points for a fighter and runs down the clock.
It seems to me, though, that strategizing around a rule that protects the fighter and not the fight will ultimately ruin the sport. In fact, it’s beginning to spoil other sports like football, where the violence between players has garnered more attention than what the sport asks of them.
Interestingly, football is dealing with the exact opposite of MMA from an entertainment perspective. Where football is reconsidering what makes it fan- and family-friendly, MMA is understanding how to become those things. Naturally, it all comes down to the violence.
This, then, is our second argument to consider. MMA has a storied history—a history that includes knees on the ground—that it cannot ignore. As it moves closer to both strict state-wide and world-wide regulation and international popularity, these choices need to be considered with more discretion for the public eye than before.
Bigfoot’s cut at UFC 146 is one of those moments where the public eye is upon the sport, waiting for the reaction. However, MMA may be at a place now where these things can be considered without worrying as much about the public’s general concerns as before.
Of course, people will still consider the sport violent—it is, after all, a combat sport and knees on the ground limns that violence. In the end, though, it’s more acceptable as an effective technique than others (like elbows on the ground) given the defenses—such as touching the ground or lay-and-pray—that have evolved from it.
Now that we’ve seen many cases of the sport’s integrity changing from this rule bending, seen the effects of the alternatives and gained a certain status as an international sport, it’s time to begin creating rules that protect the identity of that sport. It shouldn’t happen overnight, but this argument needs to begin anew on the new foundation of MMA as a sport.
Lately, testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) has taken on its own identity in the debate about legality of performance-enhancing drug use in the sport of MMA. While proponents of TRT have reasoned their way to keeping it legal within MMA, this doesn&…
Lately, testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) has taken on its own identity in the debate about legality of performance-enhancing drug use in the sport of MMA. While proponents of TRT have reasoned their way to keeping it legal within MMA, this doesn’t mean it isn’t cheating.
By this point, getting into the details about TRT, its effects and necessities, the problems with fighters and those who have used the therapy would be redundant; those things can be found readily online (I recommend Mike Chiapetta’s write-up as a starting point). What needs to be addressed, however, is MMA’s acceptance of cheating as a result.
We’ve found ourselves at a crossroads. One way runs the credibility of athletes, the competition that pits the skill and intellect of an individual against that of another in order to determine whose combination of mind, body and soul is superior.
In the process, we appreciate the aesthetics of this combination like a well-played game of chess and delight in a human’s ability to set in motion a series of choices and chance that ultimately determines victory.
Along the other way runs the credibility of the sport itself, that thing that makes competition worthwhile. It’s the reason we become fans in the first place, why most of us chose to follow mixed martial arts as the ultimate competition to test certain characteristics and help us understand the scope of human strength.
And so the balance of these is what we must reconsider when examining TRT and our acceptance of it.
TRT absolutely changes the natural makeup of the fighters, regardless of the means by which those fighters have arrived to any physical composition. The therapy can keep great fighters at the top of their game, i.e. at the level of performance that made them great; it can also make great fighters even better.
Like all great advancements in science, we all deal with the burden of knowledge. This is why applied ethics is such a crucial and integral part of a variety of curricula outside of philosophy. There is an ethics of business, marketing, engineering and, yes, sport.
Nevertheless, I’ll move beyond the classroom discussions of the ethics of sport to speak directly to the problems of TRT in MMA. While it’s legal for a number of very valid reasons, it is still cheating. TRT allows an athlete to gain an advantage in competition they couldn’t have had otherwise.
Hear me out: While I argue that TRT is definitely cheating, I argue concurrently that it is cheating only as a therapy.
We can contend night and day that there are a number of methods—substances or others—that allow athletes to gain an advantage. Even at the very basics of bodybuilding, whey protein is a natural substance manufactured by unnatural means. Beyond that, a number of other products—pre-workout boosters, growth hormones, endurance aids and others—are being manufactured and sold as safe, effective and oftentimes “natural.”
There’s no reason to argue the nature of these products, either, especially given that part of the entertainment sport provides appears to result from the needless competition of gathering food given the most modern technologies. Therefore, competition has evolved to include many of these supplements just as much as supplements have evolved to boost competition.
But when these things become a therapy, something that is given to certain athletes over others through exemptions, then what was once the only thing “natural” left in sport—the competition itself—is bastardized; advantage is prescribed.
I’ll give it to my B/R colleague Matthew Goldstein, who insists that “If you’re a fighter and your testosterone levels decrease to the point where you can’t cut it anymore, then it might just be time for a new career, as tough as that is to face.”
But my argument extends beyond his in that the natural ability of a fighter isn’t what’s being measured in MMA or any sport; we’re measuring the nature of competition.
As a result, if your testosterone is depleted, then yes, you cannot compete at the same level as the other competitors. However, if the competition is to be measured by allowing TRT to some fighters, then allow it for all as a supplement to competition, not as some ill-founded method to level an already delicate playing field.
If, in the end, safety is the concern, then follow the same protocol that everyone must follow: deny the fighter competition or allow him or her the right to treatment all fighters have. But this choice cannot be prescribed; it must be allowed as part of the “natural” arena of competition.
It may sound absurd to simply argue that this is an all-or-nothing proposition. There is, however, no other way to make this a level and equal game. Even if there was a method to measure and identify the perfect testosterone level for MMA competition, is that the variable that we choose to measure all others against?
Instead, we have to continue measuring greatness in sport as the end result of training, perseverance, genetics, psychology, spirit and the choice to sacrifice.
To that end, TRT should be offered as a completely legal or illegal choice. As a selective, prescribed therapy, however, it will always be cheating.
At last night’s UFC on FX 3 post-fight press conference, UFC president Dana White announced the plans for some headliners for UFC 152 in September. Of those is Junior dos Santos’ title defense against Cain Velasquez. Junior dos Santos is ex…
Junior dos Santos is expected to defend his UFC heavyweight championship against Cain Velasquez in a rematch. Velasquez will work to defeat dos Santos, since he lost the belt to him in 2011 at UFC on FOX. Dos Santos took the title with a commanding KO only 64 seconds into Round 1.
Since his loss to dos Santos, Velasquez came back with a convincing win against Antonio “Bigfoot” Silva at UFC 146 in Silva’s first UFC appearance since moving over from Strikeforce. Velasquez took charge of that match and won via TKO, proving that much like his loss to dos Santos, Velasquez is ready to deliver the knockout this time around.
Previously, Velasquez had become heavyweight champion after he defeated Brock Lesnar at UFC 121 in 2010, also by knockout.
While Velasquez fought to remain in contention, dos Santos fought to defend his title against veteran Frank Mir at the same event; like Velasquez, dos Santos fought his opponent in a striking match that kept the champion conclusively at the top.
This planned fight between the two heavyweights for the title promises to be an exciting one. It will likely be a slugfest between two of the most powerful strikers in the organization.
Both fighters have won all of their victories in the UFC by KO, TKO or decision. While Dos Santos does have one win by submission since entering the UFC against fellow striker Mirko Cro Cop at UFC 103, it was a submission by Cro Cop after receiving vicious blows from the knees of dos Santos.
For an event in Toronto that doesn’t yet have a venue to call home, the dos Santos vs. Velasquez rematch makes UFC 152 a potential fight of the year.
The UFC on FX 3 main card was electric.All four fights turned out to be excellent bouts, and the main-event rematch between Demetrious Johnson and Ian McCall in which Johnson pulled out a win was as thrilling as their first.But many of these fighters c…
All four fights turned out to be excellent bouts, and the main-event rematch between Demetrious Johnson and Ian McCall in which Johnson pulled out a win was as thrilling as their first.
But many of these fighters could have earned bonuses tonight. Even those who lost to KO, like Josh Neer and Scott Jorgensen, put up tremendous efforts and fought hard right up until their respective losses. Those fighters who did receive bonuses earned them tonight and left fans looking for similar performances in the future.
Submission of the Night: Erick Silva
From the beginning, it looked like Silva was going to end up on the ground. His KO power was feared coming into the match, but Charlie Brenneman knew that Silva had to be on the mat if he was to be defeated.
In the first round, Silva’s striking game seemed hindered by Brenneman’s defense and takedown attempts. Finally, Brenneman had dropped for a takedown and got Silva down.
Silva’s ability to move to Brenneman’s back and sink a rear naked choke for the win by submission was impressive and laudable, earning every bit of the UFC on FX Submission of the Night bonus.
Knockout of the Night: Mike Pyle
Tonight’s card had two fantastic knockouts, but ultimately Pyle’s KO of Josh Neer was rewarded most.
Pyle had been shaken earlier in the fight by some of Neer’s shots. But he regrouped even while Neer had Pyle falling back to the fence, and Pyle pulled off a fantastic right hand to Neer’s jaw that dropped the fighter instantly.
Perhaps more impressive than Pyle’s punch itself was his ability to make a powerful knockout blow while dancing on the edge of defeat. When your defense is a short, strong right that KOs your opponent, you earn Knockout of the Night; Pyle is absolutely deserving.
Fight of the Night: Eddie Wineland vs. Scott Jorgensen
This bantamweight fight between Wineland and Jorgensen was a tough match for both fighters, but neither seemed ready to quit until one or the other was unable to go on.
Wineland arranged this by a win over Jorgensen via knockout—one for which he could have easily taken knockout of the night on any other night. Even in his loss, Jorgensen was relentless. He traded blows with Wineland, took a number of huge shots, landed some himself and persistently attempted to take the fight to the ground to use his strong wrestling against Wineland’s striking.
But even when Jorgensen couldn’t successfully use his wrestling game, he quickly got to his feet and the fighters traded blows again. It was an exciting, relentless effort that earned both fighters a $40,000 bonus for Fight of the Night.
UFC on FX 3 was a fantastic showing.Only one fight—Demetrious Johnson vs. Ian McCall—went to decision, and even then the fighters delivered constantly until the end. Both Mike Pyle and Eddie Wineland delivered knockout blows, while Eri…
Only one fight—Demetrious Johnson vs. Ian McCall—went to decision, and even then the fighters delivered constantly until the end. Both Mike Pyle and Eddie Wineland delivered knockout blows, while Erick Silva kept his wins in the UFC within the first round.
In a night with such telling victories, the futures of many main-card fighters were determined by tonight’s performances.
Here’s each main-card fighter’s post-fight stock after tonight.