Dana White is a genius. His role in the development of MMA is tantamount to what Arnold did for bodybuilding. Every sports fan and entrepreneur must appreciate his achievement: turning a local event into an international phenomena.Some of his…
Dana White is a genius. His role in the development of MMA is tantamount to what Arnold did for bodybuilding. Every sports fan and entrepreneur must appreciate his achievement: turning a local event into an international phenomena.
Some of his many ingenious methods include: free tickets to fans, video logs, his engaging and honest personality, more fights and cards, Facebook fights, UFC Primetime, TUF, etc.; in summary, incredible work.
No single person has done more for this amazing sport than he has.
This is a list that strives to help him to be aware of some possible decisions that should be reconsidered in order to help him, and his organization, continue to flourish.
Vitor Belfort and Michael Bisping are scheduled to meet on Jan. 19 at UFC on FX 7. This should be an exciting contest that will help clarify the contender picture in the middleweight division. However, a win for either fighter will still leav…
VitorBelfort and Michael Bisping are scheduled to meet on Jan. 19 at UFC on FX7. This should be an exciting contest that will help clarify the contender picture in the middleweight division. However, a win for either fighter will still leave a great deal lacking in proving that they are title-worthy. Surprisingly, Bisping believes this contest is more meaningful.
Anderson won’t be fighting until May – and even then it looks like it won’t be a middleweight title defense. According to my boss and their boss – Mr Dana F White – Anderson and GSP will have a super-fight in May and who knows what happens then? Anderson could win and then fight Jon Jones at light heavyweight in September and go the entire year – 18months and more – since defending the middleweight belt.
Anderson Silva fought last month at UFC 153 and won in dominant fashion. He has 16 consecutive UFC wins and 10 title defenses. He is the universally recognized pound-for-pound king and is often discussed as the greatest of all time.
There is no debate that he is the best in his division. Therefore, there is no reason whatsoever for anyone to hold any other title in that division nor to suggest that there is any debate over who the king of 185 is. Bisping‘s tenuous line of thinking can easily be eviscerated by the following reasoning.
Bisping is 9-4 in his last 13 fights and has consistently lost when the competition has been in the upper echelon of the division. His four losses were against former 205 champ Rashad Evans, Pride champions Dan Henderson and Wanderlei Silva, and ChaelSonnen. He has never defeated a top-ranked opponent.
The biggest bout of Bisping‘s life was at UFC 100. In this great night of fights, Dan Henderson knocked out the brash Brit in epic fashion. Bisping, during TUF 9, had disrespected the athletes on Henderson’s team by insulting, antagonizing and even spraying water on them. Bisping, the Team UK coach, even went on to truculently boast about a guaranteed victory over Henderson. This strategy foolishly backfired, as the iconic Pride champ’s H-bomb proved why he is a legend.
While he lost close decisions to Evans, Silva and Sonnen that could have gone his way, he also had his share of fortunate outcomes. His split decision win against Matt Hamill could have easily gone against him. His win over 20-9 Jorge Rivera was very controversial as Bisping intentionally struck Rivera with an illegal knee to the head which could have easily won the match for the since retired Rivera via disqualification.
Rivera never recovered from the blow and the Brit scored a second round TKO win that deserved an asterisk. Even more disturbing is that, after he won with the advantage of an illegal blow, “The Count” spat on his competitor’s corner. Not only does he seem to lack sportsmanship when he wins, as he also did in his close split-decision win over the respectful Hamill, he vociferously pouts when a decision does not go his way like in the Sonnen, Silva and Evans losses.
The talk that Anderson Silva’s potential superfights will leave a vacuum that requires filling is a red herring. No fights have been signed, though they have been the subject of speculation for years. The champ recently fought and is looking to fight. These blockbuster fights are a good thing and should they occur, no one will be in doubt as to who the true champ of the middleweight division really is.
An interim title would be meaningless and superficial. In fact, it would detract from the great accomplishments by the Brazilian Spider and would be insulting to his success. Any temporary leave from the division will not jeopardize his throne. One should not suffer punitive measures for seeking out greater challenges and to suggest that another fighter in the division should be crowned champion is an insult.
There is no room to vacillate on this issue; there is no discussion required. The current champ, Anderson Silva, is as deserving as there has even been a champion. Respectfully, “The Spider” has convincingly cleaned out the division. There are no compelling challengers for him at 185 right now.
Perhaps a tournament testing the Lombard-Palhares winner with the Bisping-Belfort winner to eventually meet a decisive leader among Alan Belcher, Tim Boetsch and Chris Weidman could reveal a true No. 1 contender. Truly, these contenders have to prove themselves among themselves before they can sincerely demand a title shot. Bisping is talented, well-rounded and shows constant improvement, but he has not shown he is a legitimate challenge to usurp Anderson Silva’s reign.
The notion of any of these fighters being crowned a champion in the division transcends absurdity. Bisping is seeking an easy way to become champion while his athletic performances and his dissolute conduct have proven that he is not championship worthy. Lamentably, the lucrative incentive of potentially crowning a UK athlete as champion and marketing a title unification bout might influence the decision. But then again, the UFC would never impugn the credibility of their titles by awarding challenges to non-deserving fighters just to make a buck, right?
I recently had an interesting conversation with a friend who is a parent of a baseball player. He rebuked my suggestion to have his son try a few free classes at a martial arts gym, citing how much fun baseball is. I reflected on this and have sin…
I recently had an interesting conversation with a friend who is a parent of a baseball player. He rebuked my suggestion to have his son try a few free classes at a martial arts gym, citing how much fun baseball is. I reflected on this and have since come up with many reasons as to why martial arts is infinitely more fun than baseball.
The fact that performing an art is more interactive makes this a one-sided argument. The fact that baseball lacks action compounds the advantages of training in martial arts as opposed to playing baseball.
This theory is based on using modern day methodology to teach martial arts such as boxing, Olympic wrestling, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, submission wrestling and Muay Thai. The comparison will not be using an antiquated model of martial arts training that dedicates classes to training katas and having students relentlessly perform repetitive kicking and punching.
Studying martial arts is superior to playing baseball because of the simple numbers game. In martial arts there are only two participants. In baseball, there are many more.
The most exciting part of the game is obviously batting. One only bats one out of nine times at best. In some leagues and at some levels, it is even less because the rule is to go through the entire team each time as opposed to using three outs. Also, not every player starts, so substitutes bat even less.
When one is not batting, they are in the field. How boring is that? It is more probable than not that in one inning in the field, the fielder (obviously outside of the pitcher and catcher) will not touch the ball.
A pitcher striking out the side is great for the team but not so engaging for any of the fielders looking to be participating in a fun sport. How many little leaguers have been seen pulling grass and sitting down in the field with their minds adrift?
Admittedly, pitching is different. The pitcher is involved in every aspect for half of the game. They have a very exciting and pivotal role in the game. Yet, a pitcher will often not even participate in more than one third of the team’s games. In leagues where they do pitch more frequently, it is not uncommon for them to pitch two or three innings, not even bat and then be done for the game.
A martial artist is involved in every instant of the entire contest. This is why it is an art and not a sport. One is a part of the creation process and is not relegated to being an observer. It is unfathomable for a boxer to wave to his family in the crowd or for a wrestler to drift off and daydream as outfielders (at the kid’s level) are so prone to do.
Renowned Sports Illustrated journalist and columnist Rick Reilly once sought to satisfy his curiosity as to how much action actually occurs in a baseball game.
Reilly recorded the amount of time the ball was in play in a Major League Baseball game in 2000 and determined that the ball was in play for a mere 12 minutes and 22 seconds in a game that lasted 3 hours and 15 minutes. Remember that this “action” is divided amongst a minimum of 18 players.
In comparing this to the martial arts mentioned, the time is only split between two participants. The amount of action is dependent on the athletes.
Yes, there may be times when a wrestling match lacks action or there is stalling in Brazilian jiu-jitsu, but baseball and martial arts are different, as one is not inherently void of action. A martial arts competition will always carry the potential for excitement, and while not every match will be robust with activity, that will be the result of the participants and not the sport.
In baseball, the athletes have less autonomy over their individual role. The coach will determine their position in the batting order and their position in the field. Having less of a say in what one does has an inverse relationship with one’s enjoyment of an activity.
In martial arts, one is on their own on the mat or in the ring. Yes, the coach has developed their skill, instructs during the match and helped develop a game plan, but the athletes make decisions and act upon their own reactions. The coach will not admonish a student for successfully hitting a double leg when the plan was to go for a single leg, nor for successfully landing a hook when the plan was to jab.
However in baseball, one could very easily find oneself playing right field or being the catcher when their dream is to be shortstop or a pitcher. Furthermore, one could be asked to bunt or to sacrifice oneself. In martial arts, if the competitor is having success and performing with correct technique, the coach will afford them that prerogative to use their own style.
In baseball, the batting order position determines stats. Those slotted in the 7-9 positions often find themselves with far fewer opportunities to score runs and to acquire runs batted in. This does not happen in martial arts. The coach cannot take away one’s opportunity to succeed.
The only control employed by a coach that might be negative is that they often dictate in which categories people compete. A lighter individual might have to compete in a heavier category for the sake of the team. This might negatively impact one’s win-loss record.
In baseball, a single player (non-pitcher) will often play a minimal role in determining the outcome of a game. For example, a player could go 4-of-4 with no errors and lose. Their performance was impeccable, but they go home without the satisfaction of victory. In martial arts, the best performance is rewarded with the glory of victory.
An amazing aspect about martial arts is that one can always evolve. A martial artist can practice and utilize a flying scissor sweep or attempt a flying arm bar in a competition. Whereas in baseball, it is just hitting, running and fielding. Perhaps one works hard on their bunting or a hook slide but that does not compare to the infinite amount of amazing moves a martial arts can learn, develop and actually apply.
Another challenge to enjoy baseball is the fact that the success factor is out of the players’ hands. In order for one to have success batting, they need the pitcher to throw them a ball that is capable of being struck. Intentional walks and being pitched around can eliminate a players opportunity for success. In order to make a great fielding play, the ball, which acts independently from the fielding players, needs to be hit at the right place and time.
In martial arts one does not depend on external factors to perform amazing feats; rather, they use science and create their own opportunities for success. The artist paints the story of the performance and is a more active participant and is not a victim of circumstance.
To hit a walk-off home run must be an awesome feeling, but one must always have that opportunity be presented to them. One cannot use any technique to create a heroic bottom of the ninth scenario while a knockout, pin or submission comes from using intelligence and technique to have personally created that success.
Furthermore, a martial artist is never out of the match until it ends. A late second knockout or submission erases any deficit. In baseball, the players lose interest and become discouraged once they have succumbed to what they perceive to be an insurmountable deficit.
Outside of the movies, a coach rarely instructs a fighter to intentionally break the rules to injure an opponent. In baseball, beaning a batter and brushing a batter back are considered sound and fair strategies. As well as spiking to break up a double play or running over the catcher at the plate.
One could also expound upon the benefits of learning respect and humility that is entwined with martial arts but that is difficult to quantify. Additionally, I will not discuss the obvious health benefits to martial arts over baseball nor safety, as it seems to be a point for another debate. The focus here is which is more fun to participate in.
Therefore, martial arts are far more fun to train in. The fact that one is master of their fate and the one-on-one thrill of being singularly responsible for one’s outcome make it far more engaging and exhilarating. I hope to share this article with my friend and hope that he will give his son a chance to experience the joy in learning a martial art.
Last night at the Bell Center in Montreal, several Canadians were given an opportunity to showcase their MMA skills on the world’s most prestigious stage.Canada has embraced the fledgling sport emphatically and is producing many excellent fighters. The…
Last night at the Bell Center in Montreal, several Canadians were given an opportunity to showcase their MMA skills on the world’s most prestigious stage.
Canada has embraced the fledgling sport emphatically and is producing many excellent fighters. The most famous one of all is the undisputed welterweight champion of the world, GSP.
While Top 10 lists are inherently subjective and lack empirical significance, here is a list of 16 fighters from Canada that have earned recognition and deserve accolades for their evolution and quality performances.
Please note these arbitrary rankings do not solely represent career achievements, rather they are a reflection of today’s MMA climate and are based on the athletes’ recent performances, upside and momentum. It is a snapshot taken today of which fighters are best aligned to make a run at being the next great Canadian champion .
One common attribute that fight fans appreciated about MMA was that fighters were not stained by their losses. They did not care about their records, and losses were not seen as disgraces that tarnished the athlete’s mystique.Randy Coutu…
One common attribute that fight fans appreciated about MMA was that fighters were not stained by their losses. They did not care about their records, and losses were not seen as disgraces that tarnished the athlete’s mystique.
Randy Couture and Quinton Jackson were highly respected despite having a few losses on their records. This was because, in their era, the best were fighting the best—despite losses.
There is a trend in today’s MMA for the best to avoid the best.
Interim champions refuse to defend their titles until the original champion is ready to fight (Renan Barão and Carlos Conditetal.). Champions turn down fights for ridiculous reasons—Jon Jones-Chael Sonnen for spite, Anderson Silva-Chris Weidman because Weidman is not popular enough, and Jones-Lyoto Machida, though it eventually happened was maligned by Jones for low pay-per-view numbers.
Marquee headliners are now less frequent because of the paradigm shift in MMA. There are now significant risks attached to losing. A loss will be held against them and knocks them off the ladder for the biggest fights.
MMAJunkie.com provides this quote by Dana White on a potential Nick Diaz-Anderson Silva bout:
Nick Diaz makes no sense. I know that sounds fun. Yeah! Throw Nick Diaz in there! If you really look at the thing, Nick Diaz just lost to Condit at 170, so that gives him the opportunity to move up to 185 and fight the pound-for-pound best in the world? In what [expletive] universe does that make sense?”
With all due respect to the man who built the UFC, the answer is simple, Dana: In the fight universe, this fight categorically DOES makes sense.
The best fighters fight the best. Diaz-Silva is a great fight. Stephan Bonnar, despite his three-fight win streak, did not deserve that fight. The fans were cheated out of an opportunity to see Anderson Silva truly tested, and an epic encounter failed to materialize because of a fallacious and antiquated notion that a fighter who loses is unworthy of a big fight.
Dana White also told ESPN in an interview that GSP needs to defeat Carlos Condit in order for the Silva-GSP fight to transpire.
Personally, I see GSP winning easily. However, the concept that GSP needs to prove himself to earn a blockbuster bout is unsettling. It is a philosophy that is illogical and troubling. Indisputably, one of the greatest fighters of all time, an international superstar, a hero to millions, would be denied a chance at making a historical bout because of a loss to Carlos Condit?
The mere concept that a loss would discredit his legacy and make him unworthy of a mega-bout is untenable and transcends absurdity. It is representative of a mindset that plagues the sport. The UFC president should take a lesson from an icon.
One of the greatest fighters of all time made his name by seeking the biggest and boldest challenges on the planet. Felix “Tito” Trinidad was 33-0 when he challenged the best in the welterweight division: Pernell Whitaker.
He then went on to face Oscar De La Hoya and David Reid; the PuertoRican legend then tested the undefeated Fernando Vargas at super welterweight, followed that with William Joppy, Bernard Hopkins and Winky Wright at middleweight, finally retiring after challenging Roy Jones at 170.
Tito made the big fights happen. He did not win all of his fights, but he gave the sport the big fights. The same argument can be made about Oscar De La Hoya—he put losses aside and made the iconic fights happen with the biggest superstars on the planet.
There is no shame in losing in the fight game and it should not prevent the big fights from happening. This is why we have more conservative-based fight plans where the goal is get a W as opposed to performing well (such as Carlos Condit).
When a proven superstar performs well against a top fighter, a loss should carry no repercussions. While being told by Dana White to put on exciting fights, the truth is evident: Do not lose, lest you face retribution.
Big fights are becoming a rarity in the UFC and their vault is being cheated of possessing even more classics.
An example of how the Tito spirit does thrive in the UFC is the upcoming Frankie Edgar-Jose Aldo title bout at 145. Despite coming off two losses, Frankie Edgar will fight a top pound-for-pounder in Aldo. This fight makes sense and is the best possible fight between two great fighters. The losses are overlooked and the right fight is made.
Credit the UFC for this matchup.
This was once commonplace and it worked. When B.J. Penn lost to GSP at UFC 58, he returned in his next fight at UFC 63 to challenge Matt Hughes for the title. Nobody complained. It was the best fight between the best fighters.
If losing equates to loss of opportunity for a big fight, then it is more pragmatic to not fight (as No. 1 contenders now choose to do).
When two great fighters meet, it’s not possible for both to walk out with a win. They should be encouraged and applauded for taking on another top competitor, not risk punitive actions for that decision.
The current message is confusing, as top fighters are admonished for rejecting a fight (Jon Jones-Chael Sonnen, Matt Mitrione-Daniel Cormier, Shogun Rua-Glover Teixeira) and blockbuster opportunities are taken away as a result of losing.
The truth is, we now live in a universe where we may not see Dan Henderson face Jon Jones. At 42, the legendary Hendo is now battling to regain his position as No. 1 contender and sadly needs to go undefeated in his run to obtain that shot.
Considering today’s UFC climate, a loss will put him out of the contention picture. Any universe would be proud to have Hendo as a citizen and we dishonor ourselves by sacrificing his chance at championship gold.
Nick Diaz, GSP and Dan Henderson do not have to prove themselves to anybody. They have paid their dues and more. Stealing their chances at glory is unjust.
There has been a rash of fighters turning down big-name fights lately, resulting in cancelled cards (UFC 151 and the Strikeforce Cormier-Mir card).
While it is disappointing that fighters are turning down fights, it is difficult to not empathize. Losses are now being treated as stains that detract from the fighters’ status in White’s eyes. It is this type of mentality that begets bouts such as Silva-Bonnar and Jones-Sonnen as opposed to Silva-GSP and Jones-Henderson.
Take a lesson from Tito and make the big fights happen.
If there is honour among thieves, a far nobler entity should bond gladiators. In many sports, there is a code that the competitors respect. One general rule that crosses all genres of sport is to respect the knees.
In football there are rules against t…
If there is honour among thieves, a far nobler entity should bond gladiators. In many sports, there is a code that the competitors respect. One general rule that crosses all genres of sport is to respect the knees.
In football there are rules against this: chop blocking and clipping. In hockey, the same principle applies and intentional checks against people’s knees are also called clipping. In soccer, players become irate when their knees are targeted in tackles. When these fouls occur, invariably tempers flare and a ruckus ensues.
The offended parties are justified in being upset, as this not only violates rules and a code of respect among athletes, but also jeopardizes their livelihood and permanent health. Knee injuries can end a career and cripple a person; a fact to which Cam Neely and various others can attest.
Recently, there has been a trend in MMA for fighters to throw leg attacks aimed directly at their opponents’ knees. This happens from the standing position and from the seated open guard position to standing opponents. The goal is to hit the front of the knee and push it directly back. It would appear that this serves the purpose of causing long term knee injuries. A short term goal might be better served by attacking the thighs so as to tire and weaken their adversary while not causing permanent damage.
It is often described as a push kick—or, to paraphrase James Toney, a “side-check kick”. Most noticeably, Jon Jones and Anderson Silva are employing this dangerous tactic. These two are on everyone’s pound-for-pound top five list. There is no reason as to why they would need to put their colleagues at such risk when they have so many legitimate weapons to utilize. Not only that, but the power that these two very highly skilled strikers can generate makes the possibility of seriously damaging a knee very probable. To be fair to both of these legends, they have never hurt an opponent with it and often seem to be aiming for the lower thigh above the knee which would not hyper-extend the knee backwards.
Naturally, people will argue that the move is legal and therefore any fighter is completely justified in kicking directly at the knee in an attempt to force it back most unnaturally. Some may also argue that it is a valid martial arts kick as practiced for generations. I would retort that adhering to a high standard of sportsmanship is a more noble trait than acquiring “W”‘s. Further to that point, I would also pose the perspective that this technique is unworthy of representing the essence of competition and martial arts tradition.
For those that feel that this is a fight and people willingly accept the inherent risks, I would respond by stating that it is a sport. The fighters are humans. They are athletes today but they will not always be so. There will be a time in their lives when being able to walk is more important than being successful in athletics.
Admittedly, many fans would disagree and feel cheated by a ban on these attacks. I liken this to soccer-style head kicks to a grounded opponent. Banning that kick was most pragmatic and has saved numerous skulls from severe concussions. It also was not a popular decision at the time, and yet the sport managed to survive and continue to prosper.
I would ask supporters of this technique, just how aesthetically pleasing is it to view someone trying to smash in a knee? The soccer-style kicks were dramatic and intense. I would say that these push kicks are not. Why would someone want to see a fighter’s career ended by having their knee caved in like this rugby player? One question that would test if this is within the code would be to query how would my training partners feel if I did this to them during practice. It is fair to say that that athlete would find great difficulty in finding sparring partners.
Some fighters, like Jacob Volkmann, state that the strike causes no serious injury and that it only serves to irritate the opponent. He believes that the only risk to a straight knee would be to the spraining posterior capsule or straining poplateal muscle. Nate Quarry believes that it is a fine line between being acceptable and not. Hopefully, no one will ever get hurt to prove Jacob wrong.
In summary, I would suggest that all athletic commissions consider researching whether or not the potential danger in these kicks would make banning leg strikes directed towards the front of the knee with the intent to drive the knee backwards a necessary action. Moreover, I would ask athletes that use this strike to reconsider. Kicks to the thigh serve one’s aim in winning that contest much better as it tires the leg and limits the movement of the opponent while causing little risk of permanent damage.
The reality is that this not a Kumite, it is a legitimate mainstream sporting event. The fighters give enough as it is. They should not needlessly be asked to risk their future mobility as well. There is no evil SenseiKreese demanding Cobra Kai exhibit no mercy. Let’s return to old school martial arts and show our competitors the ultimate respect by besting them with skill and not dirty cheap shots.