UFC 155 Results: Did the Velasquez vs. JDS Fight Card Live Up to the Hype?

UFC 155 only lived up to the hype surrounding it because of two fights: Cain Velasquez vs. Junior dos Santos and Jim Miller vs. Joe Lauzon. Those two contests were worth the price of admission. The others on the pay-per-view portion of the card, h…

UFC 155 only lived up to the hype surrounding it because of two fights: Cain Velasquez vs. Junior dos Santos and Jim Miller vs. Joe Lauzon

Those two contests were worth the price of admission. The others on the pay-per-view portion of the card, however, were not. 

The undercard was supposed to be UFC matchmaker Joe Silva unleashing lightning in a bottle in the form of crowd-pleasing matchups. The main and co-main events were supposed to be epic struggles for dominance.  

Like the end-of-the-year PPVs of year’s past, it wasn’t just a fight card, it was an event

But after the first fight between Chris Leben and Derek Brunson, UFC 155 looked more like a regional show rather than a top-of-the-line production. 

Leben was expected to walk all over Brunson. He was supposed to get fans pumped by scoring a huge knockout. Leben was the legendary brawler and Brunson was the unheralded late replacement. It was, in theory, an easy fight to call.

But as that annoying, persistent truism goes, anything can happen in MMA.

The fight that viewers expected—and wanted—wasn’t what they got. Instead of a slugfest, it was Brunson smothering Leben with his superior wrestling abilities. 

The poor conditioning displayed by both men made the fight worse. Brunson had an excuse because he took the fight on short notice. Leben was badly out of shape and had no reason to be. He knew well in advance he was fighting that night. 

His lack of cardio helped the fight drag on. Leben was unable to escape many takedowns and was too tired to capitalize on Brunson‘s takedowns that failed. 

Even UFC president Dana White wasn’t pleased: 

Ya that fight was BAD!!!

— Dana White (@danawhite) December 30, 2012

At the post-fight press conference, White further elaborated on Brunson vs. Leben

I think I made a mistake putting [Leben] on the pay-per-view. I should have had him on the undercard. He’s been off with personal problems for a while. He’s had a lot of time off, and he looked slow tonight. I wasn’t crazy about that fight. That wasn’t my favorite fight of the night, that’s for damn sure…

[Brunson] was looking at the clock like he was a 14-year-old waiting for school to get out the entire fight – looking at the clock. You’re in the UFC your first time, and I wasn’t very impressed.

UFC 155’s woes would continue in the next fight: Yushin Okami vs. Alan Belcher

The match had a good buzz around it, mostly centered around Belcher and his possible status as a title contender down the road. “The Talent” had beaten Brazilian phenom Rousimar Palhares in his last fight. If he could best Yushin Okami as well, he’d be a top-echelon middleweight. 

Alas, Belcher‘s hype train was derailed in spectacularly dull fashion. Okami grappled Belcher to exhaustion, and the audience to sleep. 

It was a good display of wrestling and control in MMA, but that’s not what bloodthirsty casual fans wanted, especially after a similarly “boring” fight like Leben vs. Brunson

At this point, the “stacked” card seemed to be stacked only with Ambien

The following fight, Constantinos Philippou vs. Tim Boetsch picked up the pace.

Boetsch performed strongly in the first round and floored Philippou with a Silva vs. Belfort-like front kick to the face. Philippou endured the first round and staged a comeback, scoring a TKO victory over a bloodied Boetsch in the third round.

Still, it didn’t have enough pep to wipe away the malaise from the previous two contests.

Joe Lauzon vs. Jim Miller was where things changed. 

Miller hit Lauzon with almost every feasible combination in the first round. It was an incredible display of striking abilities. Lauzon wasn’t just cut open, he was gashed open. Cheers flowed from the crowd as the blood flowed from his head. 

Somehow Lauzon made it to the second round, where Miller noticeably slowed down. This enabled Lauzon to reverse the tides briefly in the second round but he couldn’t finish Miller. 

The third round was more of the same. Miller had control, save for Lauzon‘s almost-miracle leg lock in the final seconds of the fight.

Miller won a unanimous decision. Fans were cheering loudly. Twitter was ablaze with sanguinary joy.

The main event intensified these feelings.

Cain Velasquez shocked the MMA world by dismantling UFC heavyweight champ Junior dos Santos.

Velasquez’s dominance started with a massive overhand right in the first round. It continued until the final bell. Some rounds it was like watching a man against a child. 

Velasquez was too fast, too strong and too skilled. It wasn’t a fight; it was a beatdown

MMA fans were wowed by Velasquez’s abilities, but they were also enamored with dos Santos’ toughness. 

Dos Santos looked half-dead after the first round. He had almost been knocked out and his conditioning was failing him. He was barely able to hobble to his corner. Nobody expected the fight to last much longer.

It lasted twenty more minutes.

It was a superlative, exemplary display of mettle. Dos Santos was, in a way, a real-life Rocky Balboa in the sense that he was able to absorb unreal amounts of punishment without succumbing to unconsciousness. Unfortunately for dos Santos, the Rocky-like comeback victory eluded him.

This fight left people with a great taste in their mouths. Velasquez’s reputation was reforged, and dos Santos, despite losing, managed to please fans with his valor and inability to quit.

The skills and traits on display in the main and co-main events saved the card.

If the night’s first two matches showed the poor side of MMA, the last two showed the wondrous side of MMA: the unpredictability, the courage, the perseverance, the expertise, the sportsmanship, the passion. 

UFC 155 did live up to the hype because we got to see MMA’s most positive aspects brilliantly put into action on a grand scale. You can’t ask for more than that, even if there are a couple bad fights along the way.

 

Read more MMA news on BleacherReport.com

UFC 155 Results: Questions Answered and Lessons Learned

UFC 155 is over. Cain Velasquez battered Junior Dos Santos and Jim Miller defeated Joe Lauzon in one of the best fights of the year. Fighters like Constantinos Philippou, Tim Boetsch, Alan Belcher and Yushin Okami also brought their abilities to t…

UFC 155 is over. Cain Velasquez battered Junior Dos Santos and Jim Miller defeated Joe Lauzon in one of the best fights of the year. 

Fighters like Constantinos Philippou, Tim Boetsch, Alan Belcher and Yushin Okami also brought their abilities to the Octagon at UFC 155.

Their fights, as well as the others throughout the particularly stacked fight card, taught the MMA world important lessons and answered lingering questions that fans and pundits had. 

What were these questions answered and lessons learned? 

Read and find out!

Begin Slideshow

Paul Herrera and 10 Under-the-Radar, Influential MMA Figures

The history of MMA has figures, such as Paul Herrera, whose considerable influence on the sport has been long forgotten by the majority of fans.MMA’s “official” history—the Zuffa narrative—has replaced them with the usual suspects like Dana…

The history of MMA has figures, such as Paul Herrera, whose considerable influence on the sport has been long forgotten by the majority of fans.

MMA’s “official” history—the Zuffa narrative—has replaced them with the usual suspects like Dana White, Lorenzo Fertitta and Chuck Liddell.

But the true history of the sport has influential people most fans haven’t heard of before. Who are these people and why are they so important to MMA? Read and find out!

Please keep in mind that “influence” can’t really be quantified, so the members of this list aren’t “ranked” per se; they’re just listed.

Begin Slideshow

Let’s Put “Warrior” to Rest When Describing MMA Fighters

There are many adjectives in the lexicon that can accurately describe MMA fighters—”warrior” isn’t one of them. The word is used far too liberally by fans and pundits alike; it’s time to put it to rest for good.Fighters are brave individuals…

There are many adjectives in the lexicon that can accurately describe MMA fighters—”warrior” isn’t one of them. 

The word is used far too liberally by fans and pundits alike; it’s time to put it to rest for good.

Fighters are brave individuals. They risk their health and their lives in order to entertain the masses. That’s commendable but it doesn’t make them “warriors.” 

Warriors engage in war.

MMA, while dangerous, isn’t a war. A particularly grueling fight may be called a “war” but that comparison is only figurative. War is what happens between governments and armies, not what happens between two athletes in a cage.

Despite this truth, the W-word finds its way to many post-fight discussions. Phrases like “That guy is a [expletive] warrior, bro” or “Did you see the punishment he took? What a warrior,” are commonplace after brutal affairs.

True, Forrest Griffin‘s and Stephan Bonnar’s efforts in their first bout (a fight that’s considered by many to be the peak of “warriordom” in MMA) were laudable and impressive enough to put the common man (including myself) to shame.

But throwing and receiving punches and kicks does not make a warrior. 

Frankie Edgar is not a warrior for surviving Gray Maynard’s assaults and then knocking him out in their third fight. 

Fabio Maldonado is not a warrior for withstanding an unbelievable beating from Glover Teixeira before the doctor stopped the fight after the second round.

That’s another problem with the word “warrior” in MMA. Fans typically use it to describe fighters who excel at absorbing damage rather than dishing it out.

You never hear “Man, Anderson Silva is such a warrior for destroying Vitor Belfort with a front kick to the face!” Instead, the MMA world gets diatribes about how living punching bags are the bravest “warriors” the human race has ever known. 

MMA, no matter how much you want to emphasize the violence, is ultimately naught but a sporting contest. It’s participants are athletes who are trying to kick ass and make money, not warriors who are risking their lives daily on the front lines of any of the world’s numerous conflicts.

MMA is a young sport and there’s still time to influence its terminology. Let’s start now, and let’s start with removing “warrior” from the sport’s lexicon once and for all.

 

Read more MMA news on BleacherReport.com

Let’s Put “Warrior” to Rest When Describing MMA Fighters

There are many adjectives in the lexicon that can accurately describe MMA fighters—”warrior” isn’t one of them. The word is used far too liberally by fans and pundits alike; it’s time to put it to rest for good.Fighters are brave individuals…

There are many adjectives in the lexicon that can accurately describe MMA fighters—”warrior” isn’t one of them. 

The word is used far too liberally by fans and pundits alike; it’s time to put it to rest for good.

Fighters are brave individuals. They risk their health and their lives in order to entertain the masses. That’s commendable but it doesn’t make them “warriors.” 

Warriors engage in war.

MMA, while dangerous, isn’t a war. A particularly grueling fight may be called a “war” but that comparison is only figurative. War is what happens between governments and armies, not what happens between two athletes in a cage.

Despite this truth, the W-word finds its way to many post-fight discussions. Phrases like “That guy is a [expletive] warrior, bro” or “Did you see the punishment he took? What a warrior,” are commonplace after brutal affairs.

True, Forrest Griffin’s and Stephan Bonnar’s efforts in their first bout (a fight that’s considered by many to be the peak of “warriordom” in MMA) were laudable and impressive enough to put the common man (including myself) to shame.

But throwing and receiving punches and kicks does not make a warrior. 

Frankie Edgar is not a warrior for surviving Gray Maynard’s assaults and then knocking him out in their third fight. 

Fabio Maldonado is not a warrior for withstanding an unbelievable beating from Glover Teixeira before the doctor stopped the fight after the second round.

That’s another problem with the word “warrior” in MMA. Fans typically use it to describe fighters who excel at absorbing damage rather than dishing it out.

You never hear “Man, Anderson Silva is such a warrior for destroying Vitor Belfort with a front kick to the face!” Instead, the MMA world gets diatribes about how living punching bags are the bravest “warriors” the human race has ever known. 

MMA, no matter how much you want to emphasize the violence, is ultimately naught but a sporting contest. It’s participants are athletes who are trying to kick ass and make money, not warriors who are risking their lives daily on the front lines of any of the world’s numerous conflicts.

MMA is a young sport and there’s still time to influence its terminology. Let’s start now, and let’s start with removing “warrior” from the sport’s lexicon once and for all.

 

Read more MMA news on BleacherReport.com

UFC on FX 6 Results: Questions Answered and Lessons Learned

UFC on FX 6 (which served as the finale for the UFC’s The Ultimate Fighter: Smashes) is over.Ross Pearson proved he was the better man against George Sotiropoulos and Robert Whittaker and Norman Parke proved that they were the Ultimate Fighters in…

UFC on FX 6 (which served as the finale for the UFC’s The Ultimate Fighter: Smashes) is over.

Ross Pearson proved he was the better man against George Sotiropoulos and Robert Whittaker and Norman Parke proved that they were the Ultimate Fighters in their respective weight classes this season. 

Although the card was pretty banal, there were other fights throughout the night that taught lessons and answered lingering questions.

What did the MMA world learn?

Read and find out.

Begin Slideshow